|
A typical lunch now
consists of grass-fed beef
hotdogs, tofu dogs with
whole-grain buns, roastedveggie
fries, a salad bar,
fresh fruit, and milk. Simple
on its face, but each
item requires creating a
new sys t emlocat ing
vendors who can provide
sufficient quantities of
grass-fed beef hotdogs and
whole-grain buns; preparing
the veggie fries, salad,
and fresh fruit; acquiring
the milk, which is hormone-
free but not organic.
(Organic milk would cost
an additional $170,000
per yearmoney the district
just doesn’t have.)
Turning every protocol
on its head has created
a lot of opportunity for
things to go wrong, as they
did today. "The deliveries
didn’t show up," Cooper
told me. "One hundred
percent of our produce
and one hundred percent
of our milk was late, missing,
or didn’t arrive correctly
today."

What kids dig: At Martin Luther King Middle School, children prepare the soil.
"Alice doesn’t talk about the nuts and bolts,"
Cooper says. "She’s got this huge vision and
we’re on the ground trying to juggle the pieces
of it. She wants to change the whole system of
education. I’m just trying to get food on the
table so that no kids are hungry and nobody
dies. That’s it. That’s my definition of a good
day here at Berkeley Unified. And today was
not a good day."
Getting good-tasting food on the table
seems challenging enough, but it’s really only
half the battle. Trickier still is the task of getting
children to eat it. Cooper’s first months on the
job were marked by a series of debacles as children
revolted against the vegetables, walnuts,
and blue cheese that had suddenly colonized
the surface of familiar fare such as pizza. She
has since toned down the frou-frou factor, but the problem of getting families to sign up for
school lunch continues to weigh heavily on her
mind. "For the system to really work, more kids
have to buy lunch," she says.
An early milestone for the School Lunch
Initiative is to increase the number of kids in
the district eating school lunch by 20 percent.
(Waters, naturally, has even loftier ambitions.
"The intention I have is to provide every single
child at the school with lunch," she says.)
Right now, about 40 percent of Berkeley public
schoolchildren are eligible for free and reduced
lunch, but not all of the eligible families participate
either because of the stigma of accepting
free food, ignorance about eligibility, or a
dislike for the food itself. Middle- and upperincome
families also have to be persuaded to
buy lunch, at a cost of $3.00 for elementary
school students, $3.50
for middle schoolers,
and $4.00 for high
schoolers. (Those eligible
for reduced lunch
pay 40 cents.)
Waters wrote that "lunch should be the center of every
curriculum." The notion seems not just pie-in-the-sky,
but pie-in-outer-space, particularly at a time when school
curriculums already sag under the weight of hundreds of
state standards.
Given that
a highly processed,
salt-andsugar-
saturated Oscar
Meyer Lunchables package
ranges from $3.45
for bologna and American
cheese to $2.79 for
pizza, you would think
that parents would leap at the chance to pay
between
40 cents and $3.00 for a healthy, fresh
alternative. Not necessarily.
"Do you know the community?" Cooper
asks irritably when I make the clichéd observation
that her menu should be an easy sell in
Berkeley. She points out that the average Berkeley
public school family doesn’t shop at Whole
Foods Market or eat at Chez Panissethey
shop at Safeway and eat at McDonald’s, just
like the rest of the country.
Figuring out how to get children to eat
healthy food is a question that continues to perplex
researchers and parents alike. Every parent
has watched foods go in and out of vogue, and
there is probably a support group somewhere in
Berkeley for all the connoisseurs of endive and
wild salmon whose offspring spurn everything but macaroni and cheese. The culprit seems to
be partly biologicalall humans have a preference
for salty and sweet tastes over bitter and
sour onesand partly a cultural result of advertising
and our own poor modeling. Peer relationships
are another part of the puzzle. Kids
learn what foods are "good" from their friends,
as any child who has ever brought sardines to
school knows. Familiarity is important, too.
"You put bulgur wheat in front of a kid who’s
never seen it before, the kid’s going to reject it,"
explains Dr. Antonia Demas, a New York–based
researcher who specializes in food education.
"My feeling is, the kid’s just being sensible.
We’d have killed ourselves off as a species if we
ate anything that was put in front of us."

Children cultivate seedlings
Hence Waters’s insistence that lunch be made
part of the school curriculuman idea that seems
ridiculous until you see the results. "They love
to eat what they cook themselves," Waters says.
"If they grow it, and they cook it, they eat it."
Demas agrees. "Education is the critical piece
that many people don’t get," she says. Education
is critical for a number of reasons, not least
because the modern child is often startlingly
ignorant about where food comes from. Cooper
recalls discovering that her own nieces thought
strawberries grew on trees, while Demas recounts
encountering children in rural Vermont who
thought maple syrup came from cows.
Demas’s interest in the idea of a food-based
curriculum began 36 years ago, when she started
volunteering at her local Head Start Center in
Vermont. As she invited kids to touch, smell,
and taste unfamiliar foods, she found that they
were unexpectedly open-minded. "Kids like
vegetables if you introduce them in the right
way," she says. Take brussels sprouts, a food
even adults tend to push to the side of the plate.
Demas brings in a big stalk of them and invites
kids to examine them, noticing that they look
like baby cabbages. Then she peels off the little
leaves and uses them as a tiny bowl for a treat of
chopped nuts. "I’ve had kids begging for more
brussels sprouts and taking them home in their
pockets to show their parents," she says.
After two decades of classroom work, Demas
decided that the only way to convince other
educators of the importance of bringing food
into the classroom was to get some credentials,
so she went back to school and earned a
Ph.D. in education from Cornell University.
While there, she brought her food-based curriculum
into an elementary school in rural
Trumansburg, New York, and carefully measured
the results.
What she found was remarkable. The students
who had cooked, eaten, and studied the
history behind unfamiliar foods such as couscous
and collard greens devoured those foods when they were served in the lunchroom, eating
up to 20 times more than the students in the
control group. "The control kids never touched
it, it was a flat line," says Demas. "The intervention
kids ate more and more and more."
Even more surprising was what happened
next. The children who had learned about the
new foods in the classroom took their knowledge
home with them and shared it with their
families, who then began cooking the foods
themselves. Thirty-five percent of the families
reported a positive change in their eating habits.
Demas calls this the "trickle-up effect," and she
has since replicated it in places such as Miami,
Florida, and South Bend, Indiana.
"Once you’ve changed their palate and
opened their senses," she says, "you’re changing
their worldview forever."
The notion of giving children
tactile experiences with food is not
a new one at King Middle School.
Tucked behind the school buildings on the east
side of campus is a sprawling one-acre garden
teeming with vegetables, flowers, and fruit, and
all the warm, busy bits of life that make them
grow: bugs, dirt, compost, and straw. This is
the Edible Schoolyard, which Waters began in
1995 and which has since become the model for
school gardens across the nation and around the
world, so famous that in 2005 it was replicated
on the Washington Mall as part of the Smithsonian
Institution’s annual Folklife Festival, and
visited by the Prince of Wales. It is flanked by
a large, well-equipped kitchen, where students
cookand eatthe harvest.
I visited the Edible Schoolyard one morning
in September, accompanied by program coordinator
Marsha Guerrero. Guerrero came to the
Chez Panisse Foundation in 2000 after spending
20 years managing various food companies.
She has a direct gaze, a full, mobile mouth, and
a mane of black-and-gray hair. As we walked
through the garden, her fingers absently inventoried
its contents, checking a fig for ripeness,
stroking the coral-pink cosmos, picking up
a handful of dirt to feel whether it was fluffy
enough (it was). "There’s a lot going on in the
garden right now," she observed.
The garden was giddy with sunflowers,
sweet peas, tasseled corn stalks, and tall feathery
plumes of fuchsia-colored amaranth, an ancient
grain that students harvest, winnow, grind,
cook, and eat as part of a lesson on grains that
relates nicely to the 6th-grade social science curriculum,
which focuses on ancient civilizations.
"They learn that it takes a very large amount of
ground and a whole lot of work to make a very
small amount of grain," Guerrero says with a
smile. "It’s a very valuable lesson."
 |
page 2 |
| |
3 |
 |
|
|