Mar / Apr 2007
Jan / Feb 2007
Nov / Dec 2006
Sep / Oct 2006
Jul / Aug 2006
May / Jun 2006
Mar / Apr 2006
Jan / Feb 2006
 
January/February 2006  |  VOLUME 117, NO. 1
EDITOR'S NOTE
Size Matters
GOV. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER’S RECEPTION BY ADULATORY CROWDS in China last November delivered a clarifying moment for discerning California’s prospects. Here was the self-made immigrant from old Europe, the ideological legacies of which still preoccupy Washington’s foreign policy, implicitly acknowledging that the prevailing wind had changed. Here was the Mr. Universe action hero paying respect to a newly muscular land where Jackie Chan and Michelle Yeoh, as Andrew Lam writes , cinematically triumph using agility and speed to best sheer brawn. Here was the once confident reformer, rebounding from a defeat at the ballot box (that John Judis analyzes), appealing to a larger force at work on the California economy and psyche.

Further exploration: MacArthur fellow and human rights activist Xiao Qiang edits a compelling and award-winning Web site, China Digital Times, from the Graduate School of Journalism.

In fact, the histories of California and China have intertwined for a century and a half, a period that roughly traces the Chinese identity crisis, described by Orville Schell, that commenced as the last of the imperial dynasties that ruled over the 5,000-year-old civilization, the Manchurian Qing, fell into corruption and decline in the 19th century. From Canton, a center of anti-Qing rebellion, Chinese immigrants first came to California to escape imperial repression and to quest for the same "Gold Mountain" that so dazzled American ’49ers and gave California its too-dominant story. ("The traditional task of the writer in California has been to write about what it means to be human in a place advertised as paradise," Richard Rodriguez notes.)

The 1877 Wall Street crash, ensuing in part from the sudden drop in silver production from Nevada’s Comstock Lode, fired up the anti-Chinese racism of Denis Kearney and his Workingman’s Party that led, in 1882, to the Chinese Exclusion Act, which effectively ended the first wave of Chinese immigration. It did not resume until 1943, when the United States, allied with China against imperial Japan, began to allow 105 Chinese immigrants per year. Mao’s 1949 victory in China’s civil war set off the next wave, as intellectuals and professionals fled the communists, first to Hong Kong and Taiwan, and then to the United States. In 1962, Mao temporarily loosened China’s borders to relieve the mass starvation resulting from his Great Leap Forward, and in 1965 President Lyndon Johnson signed the Immigration and Nationality Services Act, which ended racial restrictions on immigration. Since that time, the number of Americans of Chinese ancestry has doubled every decade, encouraged by the thaw in relations with Beijing after President Nixon’s visit there in 1972 and Mao’s death four years later. It spiked again when many fled Hong Kong in advance of China’s takeover in 1997.

page 1 | 2
 
  Copyright © 2006 California Alumni Association. All Rights Reserved.